Sigh. New fun ethics problem. Apparent unattended AI goes around correcting basic spelling errors. Now we know the words are misspelled, we should correct them. Is this "using AI"? ugh. https://github.com/twisted/towncrier/pull/738
@glyph Interesting indeed
Honestly, I tend to think "using AI" is not the most useful concept because of cases like this. I prefer to see when maintainers are more precise about how they do or don't want LLMs to be used in connection with their project.
That being said... if you care about collecting random people's opinions (🤷), I'd say that seeing an LLM-generated PR, closing it, and making a new PR with the same diff is in roughly the same class of "using AI" as having an LLM make some changes and reviewing/refactoring/building on them locally before manually submitting them as a PR. E.g. I don't think it would pass muster in a project whose LLM policy is that LLMs can't be used to aid development in any way.